- The Vikings and J.J. McCarthy are far less equipped to exploit what the market views as a favorable matchup: McCarthy isn’t the type of quarterback who reliably elevates his play simply because the opposing defense is weaker, which limits Minnesota’s ability to fully capitalize on that perceived advantage.
- Get PFF+ for 30% off: Use promo code HOLIDAY30 to unlock the PFF Player Prop Tool, Premium Stats, fantasy dashboards, the PFF Mock Draft Simulator, industry-leading fantasy rankings and much more — everything you need to win your season.
Many NFL bettors start by looking at individual markets — like spreads, totals, teasers or props — and ask, “Which spread looks good?” or “What totals stand out this week?” This is a bottom-up approach, focusing on specific bets first.
In this space, we’ll take a different approach. We’ll focus on one game each week and use a top-down strategy to break it down. This means starting with the bigger picture — how teams, players or trends are performing — and then finding the best ways to apply that information to different betting markets.
While some of our bets may focus on traditional markets, like spreads or totals, we’ll often explore other opportunities to maximize value.
Dallas Cowboys -9.5 & -13.5
Let us begin by examining the team fundamentals to establish a baseline for our analysis.
Dallas has been clearly superior to Minnesota on offense this season, ranking top-five in efficiency by nearly every measure, while the Vikings sit bottom-five across most offensive metrics.
Defensively, the contrast flips — Minnesota has been above average all year, while Dallas’ season-long numbers paint the picture of one of the league’s worst units. Given that offensive gap and Dallas’ home-field advantage, a spread in the 5.5–6 range is reasonable, based purely on season-long results.
Where potential value emerges is in how these units match up right now. Can Minnesota’s defense slow down an elite Cowboys offense, and can a struggling Vikings offense actually take advantage of Dallas’ defense? Those questions matter even more when accounting for recent changes that season-long metrics don’t fully capture.
Since acquiring Quinnen Williams after Week 9, the Cowboys’ defense has taken a meaningful step forward. Williams has been the highest-graded run defender in the NFL this season, and Dallas has ranked top-10 in rush success rate allowed since his arrival. The pass defense remains below average, but it has improved to 20th in EPA allowed per play and 21st in yards allowed per dropback over that span. The pass rush has also surged, ranking sixth in pressure disruption rate, ninth in quick pressure rate and 10th in total pressure rate post-trade.
Taken together, while full-season data suggests a bottom-three Cowboys defense, their current form looks much closer to league average. That gap between perception and reality is where value may exist against the spread.
Returning to the core matchup question, the key issue is whether the Vikings’ defense can actually slow down this Cowboys offense. In most cases, elite offenses dictate terms against good defenses, which would normally point toward Dallas having its usual success. The defining wrinkle, however, is Minnesota’s blitz-heavy approach — no defense pressures quarterbacks more aggressively.
The Vikings are blitzing on roughly 70% of defensive snaps, an extreme outlier compared to the next-highest team, which sits closer to 40%. That rate isn’t just league-leading; it’s six standard deviations away from the mean.
Cowboys quarterback Dak Prescott has actually been more effective when defenses blitz him, averaging roughly 0.08 EPA per play better against the blitz than against standard rushes. That’s especially relevant against a Minnesota defense whose value is driven almost entirely by its pressure-heavy approach, as the Vikings lead the NFL in pressure disruptions generated off the blitz.
This is also an area where Prescott has been among the best quarterbacks in the NFL, as he ranks third among all quarterbacks in EPA against disruption, meaning that even when pressure arrives — whether via the blitz or simulated pressure — Prescott consistently mitigates its impact. Blitz rate and disruption aren’t the same thing, but given how well Prescott handles both, much of Minnesota’s defensive edge is likely overstated in the current spread.
On the other side of the ball, the Vikings and J.J. McCarthy are far less equipped to exploit what the market views as a favorable matchup against the Cowboys defense. McCarthy isn’t the type of quarterback who reliably elevates his play simply because the opposing defense is weaker, which limits Minnesota’s ability to fully capitalize on that perceived advantage.
Part of the issue is how often J.J. McCarthy turns favorable situations into negative outcomes — whether through inaccuracy, unnecessary sacks or scrambles that kill expected value. Even if the Cowboys defense creates opportunities for opposing offenses, McCarthy’s decision-making and ball placement have consistently limited Minnesota’s ability to capitalize. And when plays do break down, he has shown little ability to deliver positive results off-script.
That concern is amplified against disruption pressure, where McCarthy has struggled significantly — an area where the Cowboys have quietly improved since the arrival of Quinnen Williams.
Put it all together, and this looks like a Dallas defense the market may be undervaluing, paired with a matchup that favors the Cowboys offense. With Dak Prescott’s ability to handle both blitzes and disruption, and McCarthy’s tendency to derail drives, Dallas is well-positioned to control the game and potentially win by a margin.