Martes, 21 de julio de 2026 Mar 21/07/2026
RSS Contacto
MERCADOS
Cargando datos de mercados...
Ciencia

OBLIVION: Observing Black hole LIght Via Intensity cOrrelatioN

OBLIVION: Observing Black hole LIght Via Intensity cOrrelatioN
Artículo Completo 525 palabras
Jeff Nosanov Orbital Velocity, LLC The OBLIVION Phase I study will assess the feasibility of a novel, intensity-only interferometer architecture for direct geometric measurement of a supermassive black hole’s photon ring at gigaparsec distance. We will use Hanbury Brown–Twiss intensity correlations at 1 cm wavelength, flying two identical spacecraft in a 1.1 AU heliocentric orbit trailing […]

3 min read

OBLIVION: Observing Black hole LIght Via Intensity cOrrelatioN

Loura Hall

Jul 21, 2026 Article
Graphic depiction of the OBLIVIAN concept. Jeff Nosanov

Jeff Nosanov

Orbital Velocity, LLC

The OBLIVION Phase I study will assess the feasibility of a novel, intensity-only interferometer architecture for direct geometric measurement of a supermassive black hole’s photon ring at gigaparsec distance. We will use Hanbury Brown–Twiss intensity correlations at 1 cm wavelength, flying two identical spacecraft in a 1.1 AU heliocentric orbit trailing Earth by 20°. At that baseline the first null of the second-order intensity coherence curve for a ring subtending ~1 prad can be located to ±0.002 prad, yielding black-hole mass determinations to 3 %–ten times more precise than current reverberation mapping–and providing an independent strong-field gravity test at cosmological scales.  

We will translate this top-level science objective into a formal Requirements Traceability Matrix. Detector timing-jitter budgets will be set to ≤ 50 ps; photon-count simulations will define null-detection SNR ≥ 10^4 against sky and dark-count backgrounds; two-way optical time-transfer protocols will secure relative-separation knowledge to ≤ 0.3 m; and attitude-control allocations will ensure pointing precision ≤ 1 nrad. Each requirement will map directly to formation geometry, metrology procedures, detector performance margins and ground-segment operations.  

We will carry out mission-architecture trades between direct insertion into the 1.1 AU Earth-trailing orbit and trajectories employing lunar or Earth gravity assists. We will model ΔV budgets, coast-phase propellant margins and launch-injection tolerances; simulate baseline growth under solar radiation pressure, thermal flexure and third-body perturbations; and compare passive drift against continuous micro-propulsion control loops to maintain formation within derived margins–all through analytic evaluation without hardware prototyping. We will develop a unified CONOPS that sequences launch-vehicle separation, membrane-reflector deployment, detector activation, laser-ranging calibration, synchronized observation campaigns with baseline-adjustment maneuvers, and end-of-mission decommissioning into a continuous, time-tagged operational flow. We will draft command-sequence scripts, ground-station contact schedules, telemetry-downlink plans and two-way timing-exchange protocols tied to orbital geometry. Embedded anomaly-detection algorithms and recovery routines will preserve data integrity during metrology-link dropouts or formation drift, all within analytic study scope.  

We will execute high-fidelity, end-to-end simulations coupling intensity-interferometry performance models with realistic noise and error sources–including detector dark counts, sky background flux, platform jitter and clock drift–to generate error-covariance matrices, sensitivity maps and Monte Carlo risk-assessment frameworks. A comprehensive risk register will catalog architecture-level hazards, rank them by likelihood and consequence, and propose mitigation strategies fully contained within analytic tasks.  

At Phase I closeout we will deliver the validated Traceability Matrix; a mission-architecture report with detailed trajectory analyses, ΔV summaries and baseline-growth profiles; a complete CONOPS document with event-flow diagrams, command scripts and ground-segment interface definitions; and a comprehensive simulation and risk-assessment compendium with sensitivity maps and Monte Carlo reports. A development roadmap will link each requirement and identified risk to technology-readiness targets and simulation milestones. By focusing exclusively on science requirements, architecture evaluation, operations concepts and systems-level modeling–without hardware development–OBLIVION Phase I will determine whether intensity-only interferometry can deliver transformational black-hole science at gigaparsec scales and prepare the way for a Phase II design effort.

2026 Selections

Facebook logo @NASATechnology@NASA_Technology

Share

Details

Last Updated Jul 21, 2026 EditorLoura Hall

Related Terms

Keep Exploring

Discover More NIAC Topics

Space Technology Mission Directorate

NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts

NIAC Funded Studies

About NIAC

Fuente original: Leer en Nasa - Ciencia
Compartir